Saturday, November 08, 2008

Yesterday, Katy posted about her voting decision, including this:

  • I didn’t vote for him because I’ve grown ever more fond of principles than I will ever again be fond of personalities.
To the whole post, Amen, Katy.

I felt through this whole election, before and after, that there was in some circles a rather overemphasis on the race issue despite the press about how much the Obama campaign tried to suppress that. Even though it didn't come up in many conversations at my office (perhaps it was not even the elephant in the room, most of the time), the post-election reaction has made it quite apparent that this was what was on many minds even if they didn't speak it in my presence. Did they feel like they couldn't? Most of those who didn't mention it during but have often since haven't known me for long enough to know of my absolute distaste for making racial issues larger than they could be, or of my own past experiences that lends credibility to my view. They have, perhaps, known me for long enough to see that I am the consistant in relation to race, that I speak professionally to Officers regardless of their color, and in working situations, and that I may speak informally (usually with a mix of Deep-Southern and ebonics as strong influences) in my down-time, but that the color make-up of the audience is not a factor in how I speak.

Anyway, I say all of this to say that his acceptance speach was very good, very moving. I agree wholeheartedly with Katy that he is a very charismatic speaker who can wrap most listeners into the moment and capture attention and appreciation with seeming ease. Because of a phone call (it was working hours here when ya'll were getting the official results), I missed the portion of the speech when he talked about the 106 year old woman who was determined to stay alive to see a black president elected. When one of my supervisors was telling me about this later (and was also talking about her mother being so very glad for the same reason), and then I received an e-mail -- from the base Equal-Opportuntiy Advisor of all people -- that showed simple characatures of each president, all the previous in the same beige-flesh-tone and then suddenly a dark characature at the end, with the caption being about how the voice of the American common man has spoken up for diversity..... when all of these things were happening, I still couldn't escape the overwhelming idea that perhaps we have brought ourselves our first black president in the same way that many people find their first spouses... jumping at the first decent option that comes along.

I am not saying that I don't think he will be a good president. As I mentioned that morning, I am not upset about not getting my ballot this year (although apart from the Presidential election, I'm not sure what else was on the Florida ballot this time around and would perhaps be more opinionated about those issues) because I feel pretty apathetic about the decision this time around. No clear winner and no clear loser for me. How he does as president, and how we shape up as a nation, will be determined in time regardless of how much promise he may hold now.

What I am saying is that if he was truly the far-and-away best candidate, I think the margin in the popular vote might have been a bit more dramatic. I think that the conversations would be less about race and more about policy and history.

But, since I don't think he was a worst candidate, either, or even a particularly bad one, I do join in the hope that his presidency will go well, that we will see many improvements in our nation and in the world. I do hope that it continues the constant search for reconciliation, but I will know it has succeeded when we stop having so many Firsts all the time. I'd like to see our presidential candidates have a race-free race. That is not to say that we won't relate to ethnic aspects of their personal heritage (just as we do to their religion or their family's countries-of-origin) but simply that it won't be such a primary factor for the majority. For example, my Irish heritage helps me appreciate a candidate who shares this heritage, but not all white candidates. His Kenyan heritage could be related to by fellow Kenyan-descendents, but not necessarily all of African descent. It's notable that the white side of his heritage is barely acknowledged, at least in what has reached us over here.

I have mentioned before that this country (where I am now) is a remarkable joining of races and cultures. I forget if I have ever mentioned that, as with many or most other regions, there is also a certain elitist thinking among many of the locals, especially in their perspective of certain other nationalities who have more often filled a servant or laboror role within society here. It gets a little bit deeper than I think I could (or am ready to) express on here, but it has been interesting to become aware of and able to understand exactly what the different ideas are about various local/regional countries (even those at the top of the elitism tiers) and how many of them view the other surrounding countries. This mentality has made this election very interesting from a different perspective than I would have had if I had been living in the States during it, from much more of a world-view than I could have possibly had if I weren't here during it.

Here's to democracy, here's to reconciliation and to diversity, here's to overcoming, truly overcoming.

5 comments:

  1. I guess Katy is a republican, because President-Elect Obama spoke to plenty of principles, just not those of Senator McCain's base.

    I remember when you were very, very young and your mom and I had Jesse Jackson for President T-Shirts! Really hoped he'd win, too! If anyone was the "first to come along," it was Jesse. Of course, the Jesse then was much different than the Jesse we've seen over the last years.

    Yes, electing the first Black President was important, and we should not lose sight of its significance. But ending the truly depressing eight years of the Bush Presidency, and ensuring that #44 would not continue that track record, or worsen it, was a much more important goal. Senator McCain proved, by his very lack of the maverickness he and his "soulmate" touted, that he would continue down the path of self-destruction more commonly known as "Dubya."

    And don't get me started on Sarah Failin'!!! You bethca I'd have a lot to say about her hillbilly neoconservativism.

    President Obama will bring something to the office that Dubya steadily lost beginning in 2003, with the invasion of Iraq, and worsening ever since with the uncovering of the truth that there were no WMDs, that Bush and Cheney planned to invade Iraq long before 9/11/2001, and that they ensured the evidence as revealed at te time backed up their decision, while hiding evidence to the contrary. In law, they call that prosecutorial misconduct. In a President, it's called an impeachable offense.

    I am hopeful that Senator McCain' concession speech will signal a new era of Republican cooperation in working to get us out of the mess that Dubya has so eagerly gotten us into. It won't be easy, and it won't happen overnight, but I too am convinced that reconciliation and diversity will win the day.

    "Here's to Democracy" back at you!

    love, Dad

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, Patty! I have enjoyed "meeting" your dad tonight. He has now paid his first visit to fallible. I am afraid I did not make a good first impression, but I think he and I are making progress... ;)

    Thank you for the nice comments. Loved your words of wisdom here.....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, Katy, definite progress ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. When I was very young, Dad? You still have your Run, Jesse Run tee! ... I didn't say Obama was the FIRST option...

    I remember when I was not so young but still a child, and my brothers and I started saying we were not democrats, more to get under your (and mom's) skin than anything else, but as I grew and saw and experience the world, I realized that actually I am really not a democrat. I am compassionate, I care deeply, I believe in humans helping each other get through this crazy world.... but I am not a democrat. You know that I am a registered republican, though not necessarily a staunch republican.

    Like Katy said in her post, she looked into Obama's records and found that she did not agree. And that, dear father, is the beauty of democracy, is it not? And the fact that he will be our president whether or not we voted FOR (or against) him. Just as President Bush was the leader of us all whether or not we voted for him, no?

    Your opinions on President Bush are rather strong, of course, as are the rest of my democratic family's. And you know that overall, I don't necessarily agree with a lot of the factors on which you base those opinions. I think that the chances of there being lies and corruption after the fact are just as great as lies and corruption beforehand, but that Bush was not the only one at all who had been completely convinced about the WMDs... it's like when John might tell you I made a face at you and you turned to see me smiling, that doesn't mean I was sticking my tongue out a moment before. ;)

    You don't have to convince me now that McCain was not a good condidate or his running mate was not a good decision... I don't know how many people still supported her in the end there, but most I've spoken with from both sides of the house agree that she was the worst decision he made in the whole campaign. Either way, it's already over, and I don't feel any regret about what the American people (popular or electoral) decided... I was waiting on my ballot to come in before I really made a decision myself, and since it didn't, I didn't... But saying I'm not sure I would have voted for him doesn't mean I would have voted for McCain, or vice-versa. At any rate, what's done is done and we'll see where things go from here.

    I did fill out some information about the absentee ballot process, by the way. And I also noted on another friend's blog that you were the only one to send me candidate's information, which means all of my many Libertarian and other democratic relatives must not value my vote that much... or they figure I'm to stubborn to be convinced... Really, I'm not. Except about welfare. Or certain other government assistance agencies. Or certain other policies that are generall supported more strongly be democrats and/or liberals. But, you know, otherwise I'm not.

    So that's my take. And now it's bedtime. Goodnight!

    ReplyDelete
  5. When I (with emphasis) was young, Republicans were not largely represented by those we see today. I did actually vote for a Republican at least once -- Frank Sargent (spelling?) for Goveror. He was the incumbent and lost to Michael Dukakis in the early 80s. THAT was a case where I didn't see a lot of difference between the candidates and in fact I think the Republican was MORE liberal in a lot of ways. We also had one of the first Black Senators, who was also quite progressive for a Republican.

    But the Republican Party today is a lot different. Filled with "Neocons" and folks who want to villify Democrats as "socialists" while proclaiming themselves the party of change and hope! You can't be soemthing you are not and the Republican Party is NOT hope and change.

    And there were vast differences between McCain and Obama. I was quite pleased to hear that your cousin Scott voted for Obama, though your uncle decided for some reason that he had to represent the Republican Minority by going with McCain.

    I don't have the Run Jesse Run T-shirt anymore. Should have put it away many years ago before I wore it into tatters. But that shirt, and the Children's Books about Martin Luther King, Jr. were certainly part of your childhood.

    As far as Bush, it is not merely a question of his being convinced about WMDs. Surely, in the heat of the "moment" of the aftermath of 9/11, many of our leaders were guilty of acting without reading and investigating, and Bush was given way too much leeway. But there is STRONG evidence that he and Chaney (and partcularly Chaney) actively participated in burying information and encouraged fabrication of information to support their going into Iraq,and that this began long before 9/11. If I was a paranoid conspiracy theorist I might think they caused 9/11 in order to have an excuse to make things right for his dad! But I'm not!

    I'm sorry that no one else talked to you about your vote. And I am surely sorry that you didn't get your ballot -- I thought only Democrats got disenfranchised!!! But I do feel it's important that you get information to help you make your election decision. Too many people get all their politicalnews from Fox News -- which is a really, really BAD mistake!!!

    Well, have to get some things done and then off for a haircut.

    Love,

    Dad

    ReplyDelete